
LNG News
| - Abundance
of sharks, whales, birds, and fish suggests the old days are back
- An Inconvenient Truth 092106 - Anti-LNG Letter from Several Famous Malibu Residents 091806 - Thousands attend Anti-LNG Rally 080807 - Art MacKay Letter - Art MacKay Letter to Editor re LNG - Art MacKay Right Whales at Deadmans 110406 - Berry Letter to Congressmen 100406 - BIA Motions to Intervene in Downeast LNG Project 031008 - Bishop Bill to Guard Nation's Vital Estuaries 040207 - Brier Island Whale & Seabird Tours 062706 - California Panel Nixs LNG Port Near Los Angeles 042307 - Canada formally objects to LNG tankers in Canadian waters 022308 - Canada Formally Opposes LNG Will Refuse Head Harbour Passage 021507 - Canadian Minister of Foreign Affairs Letter to Berrys 042107 - Canadian Petition to Protect Right Whales in Head Harbour Passage 012807 - Canadian PM to Bush - No LNG in Passamaquoddy Bay 08/30/07 - Cliff Goudey Comments re LNG May 2006 - Cliff Goudey Comments re LNG January 2007 - Cliff Goudey Email re LNG January 2007 - Cliff Goudey Letter re LNG - Coast Guard Proposes Safety Zone For Gas Tankers 030207 - Comments: Atlantic Salmon Commission 010507 - Comments: Cove Brook Watershed Council 010507 - Comments: Division of Land Resource Legislation 010507 - Competition Increases Between 2 LNG Projects 061008 - Criticized for Role in LNG Dispute 122306 - Dangers of LNG Underplayed says MIT Engineer - Saint Croix Courier 082506 - Dead Juvenile Right Whale - Dead Whale Found in Passamaquoddy - Deadline Notice from FERC to Downeast LNG 080207 - Definition of Internal Waters 031107 - DELNG Withdrawal from State of Maine Application 091507 --- Response to DELNG Withdrawal of Maine Application 091507 - DMR Withdrawal as Cooperating Agency 122106 - Does LNG Have a Viable Future in Maine Bangor Daily News 061006 - Doucets Explains Provincial LNG Stand 022307 - Downeast Proposes Dredging at Mill Cove across from St. Andrews 091106 - E-mail from Sharon Howland to Kathy Berry 080307 - Eastport Outlines LNG Concerns 053007 - Environmental Injustice: Developing LNG on Passamaquoddy land 072207 - EPA's Letter re Downeast LNG May 2006 - Evening Times Globe December 1973 - FERC Plans LNG Impact Study - FERC Suspends Quoddy Bay LNG Review 042608 - Fin Back Whale off Campobello Head Harbor Passage. Picture was taken from Richard Berry's boat by Danita Nickle. They also spotted minke whale near the same location. 090206 - Fisheries and Wildlife Recommend Denying LNG Permit 052007 - Harper Dismisses Bush Plea for Gas Tankers Passage 12/14/07 - How Do East LNG Tankers get by Quoddy LNG Tankers at Berth at Split Rock? - Hurray for Canada 042907 - Is LNG a Smokescreen? 040807 - Janice Harvey Sums it Up 040207 - Kathy Berry Poem - Kathy Berry's Letter to Chamber of Commerce - Last Gas Hillary Bain Lindsay, The Dominion August 2006 - Law of the Sea 052007 - Law of the Sea Notes 052007 - Lawmakers Fear Additional LNG Terminals will Outstretch Security Resources 040207 - Letter & Brochure to Robbinston Residents January 2006 - Letter from Brian Flynn November 2006 - Letter from RADM Flynn re LNG Quoddy Bay July 2007 - Letter from Premier of New Brunswick November 2006 - Letter from Berry's and Robbinston Residents 072007 - Letter re LNG Filing October 2006 - Letter re LNG Filing October 2006 - Letter Sent to Maine Delegation on Behalf of Quoddy Canadians - Letters of Opposition to LNG 110706 Letter 1, Letter 2, Letter 3, Letter 4, Letter 5, Letter 6 - LNG Companies Won't Quit 022407 - LNG Delays Spark Jabs Between Companies - BDN 060708 - LNG Risk Analysis re Quoddy Bay - Art McKay & Cliff Goudey 012807 - LNG St. John vs LNG Passamaquoddy 021607 - LNG Shortfall Coming? 032807 - LNG Tanker Adrift 35 Miles Off Cape Cod 021108 - LNG Tanker Compared to Freighter 111006 photo - Magic City Morning Star - Maine Bureau of Parks and Lands re LNG Passamaquoddy April 2006 - Maine Bureau of Parks and Lands re LNG Mill Cove April 2006 - Maine Withdraws as a "Cooperating Agency" 120206 - Mayor Enlightens FCM Members about LNG Threat 091507 - Maine's Ruling Family 080607 - Moving Beyond Threats and NB Latest Move!!! 022707 - National Moosehorn Refuge, Letter to FERC 122306 - Navigation One of Many Issues Facing LNG Projects 042007 - NIMBYism Girdis says..... 011007 - Ottawa to consider banning US bound tankers from NB 091007 - Ottawa Unmoved by LNG Study 100907 - Outlining the Consequences of an LNG Disaster - Passamaquoddy at Pleasant Point Comment on LNG 031008 - Passamaquoddy Bay is in an Earthquake Prone Area 042006 by Richard Berry - Passamaquoddy Bay vs Saint John Harbour - Perry - LNG Negotiator Causes Concern for Voters 120806 - Lesley Pinder, MD Op-Ed 040207 - Pleasant Point Reservation Comments re LNG 031508 - Press Release - Premier Will Act on LNG Issue September 2006 - Quoddy Tides Article June 2006 - Quote from Hansard, Official Record from the House of Commons 092906 - RADM Flynn letter to PM Harper 072906 - RADM Flynn Response to Girdis Op-ED 120607 - Response to Senator Susan Collins 061407 - Richard Berry's Comments 12/28/05 LNG Meeting - Robert Godfrey's Letter to FERC 043006 - Robert Godfrey's Letter to FERC 121306 - Roosevelt Campobello Comments re LNG 050807 - Sharp Response to Oklahoman Article on Quoddy Bay LNG Smith Family 100806 - Sierra Club [provided by Kathy Berry] 050608 - Sierra Club Maine Submission to Maine BEP 092407 - SPB Exposes LNG Ships' Hazard to Passamaquoddy Bay 060807 - State Denies Downeast LNG Request to Withdraw Application 092107 - Statement by Girdis and Response by MacKay 021707 - Statement of Concern for Passamaquoddy Bay and its Citizens 080207 - St. Andrews donates to save Passamaquoddy Bay 120806 - Teen Earns Award for Work Opposing LNG Terminal 061008 - The Tide Online - Time Article 1974 - Does This Sound Familiar? 040207 - Town of Liberty Concerns 121506 - Tribes Frustration Flairs Anew 011007 - Upcoming Seminar - US Coast Guard Responds to Downeast LNG Claims 021707 - U.S. Company to Harness Tides of Southern NB 030707 - US DoI rejects DELNG pipeline through Moosehorn 100407 - Where will the Eagle Sleep? 053007 - Whole Bay Study confirms LNG opponents' arguments August 2006 - With LNG, Maine ought to fight for fishermen's rights 011207 - Yellow Wood Responds RADM Brian Flynn, U.S. Assistant Surgeon General (USPHS, Ret.)
comments about Downeast LNG President Dean
Girdis's op-ed in the 2007 Nov 11 Maine Sunday Telegram — E-mail to Kathy Berry Are We More Than A Tourist Destination? You Bet We Are! As Indigenous leaders involved in taking care of our land, and protecting our descendant's rights to clean air, water, and land, our primary focus is protecting Passamaquoddy Bay and our cultural and ceremonial gathering place, Split Rock. Within the reality that each of us now face - global climate change - our work is even more critical for creating justice for Indigenous people facing environmental and cultural destruction. For us, environmental racism is DownEast LNG and Quoddy Bay LNG both vying to control our inherent wealth - our holy waterscapes-- our sense of place - our dignity-our heartland-simply because the Governor of Maine thinks it's best. We did not choose LNG: it was chosen for us. Rather than deal with the economic challenges in Washington County, a few politicians and even fewer community leaders have decided to gamble away our heritage waters and coastal communities for a quick fix. LNG: it's the carrot these few now pursue. Launched in 2004, Nulankeyutomonen Nkihtahkomikumon (NN) is an organized grassroots effort challenging the leveraged selection of tribal land in Sipayik as the site for an LNG import terminal. There years later, several local referendums have been promoted as milestones, and achievements for Quoddy Bay LLC, each a part of a grand hoax-a smokescreen. Whether or not these claims for success will prove to be just happy talk -- NN denounce each as part and parcel of the policy at play- environmental racism. NN reaffirms our commitment to Take Care of Our Land and aims to reframe environmental justice in public debate. Act today! Voice your opposition to Quoddy Bay LLC and Downeast LNG's projects-desecrating Passamaquoddy Bay and Split Rock is not economic development. NN believes Maine's coastal communities deserve better - join us and help transform the current lack of leadership for renewable energy and a just society. Write to your senators and representatives and express your concern about LNG and environmental injustice. Vera Francis 040907 Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 To: rep.tomallen@mail.house.gov From: Clifford Goudey <cgoudey@mit.edu> Subject: Maine, FERC, and LNG import terminal siting Cc:Bcc: cgoudey@mit.edu X-Attachments: Dear Congressman Allen, Below is a letter written by the entire Connecticut congressional delegation and sent to FERC Chairman Kelliher expressing their united opposition to the Broadwater LNG terminal proposed by Shell and TransCanada in the middle of Long Island Sound. I was struck by their stated basis for concern: the long-term health, vitality and accessibility of Long Island Sound and the industrialization of a sensitive ecosystem. These seven elected officials have taken this stance with a full knowledge of the importance of natural gas to Connecticut's economy and the energy needs of its residents. They have taken this stance knowing that the distance of the proposed Broadwater terminal from Connecticut's shoreline offers little risk to its citizens. They have taken this stance while cognizant that the shores of Long Island Sound are already heavily industrialized and the waters are busy with maritime traffic. But out of an obligation to principle and the concerns of their constituents, they have taken a stand against uncontrolled energy development. For four year the coast of Maine has been the target of energy companies looking to place their LNG import terminal. Citizens of Harpswell, Cumberland, Yarmouth, Searsport, Corea, Prospect Harbor, Pleasant Point, Robbinston, Calais, and Cutler have woken up one morning to learn their town had become targeted. Some LNG developers were serious, some were just quietly probing, but the citizens have spoken clearly in each case. However, today those living around Passamaquoddy Bay are facing the greatest threat yet: two land-based LNG import terminals have progressed through pre-filing and are now under review by FERC. So far, opponents, though in the majority, have been powerless to stop these two lingering projects. Through all this acrimony the Maine delegation has been deafeningly silent. Yet unlike Connecticut, LNG is irrelevant to Maine's Economy and fewer than 2% of Maine's population have direct access to natural gas. Like the Connecticut situation, these projects represent a major threat to the local ecosystem and to continued access to public trust waters. But unlike Connecticut, Maine has a coastal economy that depends in large part on marine resources and tourism. However, and most important in my mind, these two Maine proposals are land-based and represent a safety and security hazard to Maine citizens. It is time for leadership. It is time for Maine's Senators and Representatives to make it clear to FERC and would-be developers that Maine is not interested in hosting inappropriate energy infrastructure so that southern New England can heighten its addiction to imported energy. It is time to remove the threat that currently hangs over Passamaquoddy Bay. Please voice your objection to the reckless siting activities of LNG developers, to the mindless accommodation of FERC, and to the two ill-conceived projects in Washington County. Better yet, prepare a bipartisan message in collaboration with your colleagues and proclaim Maine's position as clearly as Connecticut has. I would be happy to assist in any way toward the crafting of such a communication, helping you make sure it is fact-based and responsive to the issues before the FERC. Respectfully, Clifford A. Goudey cc: Sen. Snow Sen. Collins Rep. Michaud Mark Wren: With LNG, Maine ought to fight for fishermen’s rights. [BDN Staff Thursday, January 11, 2007 - Bangor Daily News] Massachusetts and fishermen there have reached a $23 million settlement with an LNG company attempting to site a terminal off the coast. The money is to compensate the fishermen for loss of livelihood and gear or to compensate them for giving up their fishing permits. With two different LNG terminals being permitted in Passamaquoddy Bay, we have read nothing about a pay out to our area fishermen, let alone what the environmental impact will be over 20 to 30 years. I realize Robbinston only has a handful of fishermen plying the bay for their livelihood and Downeast LNG has contacted some fishermen individually about compensation for the loss of fishing, but a solid commitment to these fishermen has never been followed up. Our few fishermen are only a fraction of the people fishing Robbinston waters. Only eight miles away is another LNG project attempting to gain permits. These two terminals will affect a large area of good fishing ground involving individuals from all over the area. I don’t recall hearing these LNG firms offering any pay out either. The local Washington County LNG developers have stated their ships in transit and terminal will not affect fishing in the bay or the environment. Fishing would go on as always with very little interruption, therefore compensation for fishing would be very minimal. It seems that Massachusetts and its fishermen believe there will be definite damage not only to lobsters and fishing but also to the ocean environment and marine life. They negotiated $23 million in total funds to cover a 20-year life of just one terminal. The site in question is 13 miles offshore, not even involved in local shipping or inshore fishing. Our developers are pushing two sites in tiny Passamaquoddy Bay. LNG tankers will be passing in and out of the bay on a daily basis. The LNG cargo vessels are expected to be at least 1,700 feet in length and at least 250 feet wide. There will be four or five ocean-going diesel tugs involved in moving each LNG tanker in and out of the bay and up to Perry and Robbinston. These LNG tankers draft 55 feet when loaded and the terminal pier for Robbinston is stuck out into the bay 4,300 feet. How will the fishermen, let alone tour boats, be able to work around this situation. What will the impact be on the lobster, crab and marine industry after 20 to 30 years of this type of development? LNG tankers in this situation are being forced on our Canadian neighbors. The fishing communities on the other side of the border have absolutely no leverage in gaining any compensation for their losses. The impact of the LNG ships is more far-reaching. Because of the area involved in the transit through Canadian waters, the livelihoods of the approximately 17,000 people are affected on the Canadian side. Not only a thriving fishery, the islands have established a healthy tourist industry. Both would most definitely be affected by the daily tanker traffic through their waters. Dean Girdis of Downeast LNG has tried to compare the LNG tankers to the passage of cargo vessels docking at Bayside, N.B., to fill up with gravel and stone. These vessels are approximately 280 feet long and most times do not use the Head Harbor passage for transit. There is a big difference between these vessels and what the LNG developers are proposing. The LNG tankers have to be turned 90 degrees at the entrance to the Head Harbor passage, pass through the narrows and past Deer Isle, then turned 90 degrees in front of Eastport to head up river. This route is in Canadian waters and involves all these small fishing towns. What will the effect be on the entire estuary? Why is the state of Maine not looking at the big picture here in Washington County? Our representatives on all levels seem to be nonexistent. Shouldn’t our state take some notice of what is conspiring here in Washington County and Passamaquoddy Bay? Where is the support from Augusta for our fishermen and the environmental impact on the whole bay over the next 30 years? The Passamaquoddy Tribe has already entered into a contract with the Split Rock developers for $15 million to $17 million in royalties per year. The proposed contract for the town of Robbinston, dated December 2005 with Downeast LNG, is asking for $1,200,000 annually with a percentage of town taxes paid, and a list of miscellaneous extras. Both LNG projects when operational will make billions in profits for the oil and utility companies per year. I see no mention of compensation for any fisherman’s loss of income, loss of gear or decline in fishery stocks. Perhaps it is time for these two host towns to realize the lasting impact and what the magnitude of these projects mean to the lives of all the people in the bay, not just for the 500 people in Robbinston or the struggling Passamaquoddy Tribe. I realize that there will be the potential of jobs on the tugs for some U.S. fishermen, but what about the people who have made a living on the bay for generations? What about a way of life? These developers need to be held accountable for the future of this bay. With or without help from the state government, the towns chosen as sites for LNG need to take the responsibility that appropriate compensation is made by the LNG companies for the jobs that will be lost in the bay on both sides of the border. Please wake up people; this really is the big picture. [Mark Wren lives in Robbinston.] These comments by SPB's Webmaster, Bob
Godfrey Assault on Maine Coast. Cliff
Goudey. Dean Girdis, president of
Downeast LNG, claims a "bottom-up approach to gather public support for the
project." ("Second LNG applicant files with FERC," BDN, Dec. 23) What he really
means is he sold the idea to the citizens of Robbinston as a concept rather than
with its industrial warts showing. As a result, his project is neither "safe"
nor "environmentally sound." No clever approach is going to
change the properties of LNG and the lethal consequences of an accident. No
amount of paperwork is going to bring the proposed site closer to the pipeline
or to the natural gas markets in southern New England. Nor can wishful thinking
change the treacherous tidal currents in Passamaquoddy Bay and Head Harbor
Passage. The chosen site has only one thing going for it; the town is small and the voters were easily swayed. By
contrast, eight other communities along the coast of Maine have rejected the
hazards and blight associated with an LNG terminal.Unfortunately, FERC has never
denied an application for a new or expanded LNG import terminal. Downeast LNG
and its schizophrenic running mate, Quoddy LNG, will both receive their federal
approvals in 2007. Hopefully the state's permitting process has sufficient discretion to block this assault on the coast of Maine
and the disastrous affect it would have on the economy of Passamaquoddy Bay. If
not, Canadians have vowed to block the passage of such huge and dangerous
cargoes through their territorial waters. And even if these roadblocks were
absent, Downeast and Quoddy are too late in the North American LNG gold rush to
gather the financing or source the LNG needed to get either project
started. Cliff Goudey Newburyport, Mass. Saint Croix Courier St. Stephen, NB 2006 December 8. Town donates to Save Passamaquoddy Bay
By BARB RAYNER ST. ANDREWS — Save Passamaquoddy Bay Canada are continuing
their fight against liquified natural gas (LNG) in Passamaquoddy Bay and at
Monday night's meeting town council gave their fund-raising a boost. Councillor Mary Myers said there are still many legal
battles to be fought and the information needed will require many hours of
research with reports to be produced so their lawyers will have adequate
information to defend their position. She said expert witnesses may need to be hired and committee
members may be required to travel to hearings. She noted that they are still a
long way from seeing the defeat of the LNG menace. Council agreed to grant $3,000 to SPB Canada to assist them
in their fund-raising and the money will come from the town's LNG
funds. During councillors' comments Councillor Mike Craig said he
hoped that the people of Passamaquoddy Bay will be successful in slaying this
LNG dragon in 2007. Councillor David Welch encouraged everyone who loves the bay
and wants it to continue on as it is, to contribute to this very important
campaign. "It's coming to crunch time very soon. There are still two
active developers that are planning and working actively towards getting their
applications into FERC (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission). "We're going to require money to provide for interveners,
provide for lawyers so it's very important that people step up to the plate...
[There are] lots of people working on these issues but a lot of these people
don't come at a cheap rate so I again encourage people to donate towards this
very important cause." ----------Date: Sat, Nov 4 2006 5:12 pm From:
"Art" My wife and I drove to Deadman's Harbour, between Blacks Harbour and Beaver Harbour, this morning
to see if we could site some of the 20 or so right whales cruising along the shore between Mace's Bay and Blacks Harbour. Once you cross the causeway at
Deadman's Harbour and crest the hill, there is a magnificent view towards the Wolves, Grand Manan, and Campobello. Sure enough, before we stopped the car
Marg spotted a right whale blow just off the shore. We spotted perhaps 5 separate animals blowing and diving in this area, some in on the shore and
some offshore a miles perhaps. There was an aggregate freighter anchored
there in the same area. This was at 10 am, Saturday, November 4, 2006. We went to Pennfield and had breakfast and returned to the same
viewing area at 11:30. 4 or 5 right whales were feeding directly below us in a tight group to the east of a little island there. I got some
magnificent, if distant, photos that I will be posting on my Flickr site. Check out www.bayoffundy.ca later today and you will be able to link through
to see them. Taken together, the right whale sightings of the last couple of weeks reinforce my stand that these animals occur more broadly then just
in the sanctuary off Grand Manan. In fact they have occurred historically right where we are seeing them and into Head Harbour Passage as
well asjust outside Big Letite Passage. Recent researchers seem to have focused on summer sightings over the last 10 years or so and have
been missing data from later in the season as well as night. This is all right whale territory and frankly the proposed routes for LNG tankers,
whether from the Fundy Traffic Lane or through Grand Manan Channel, both pose a very serious threat to this important endangered species. If we truly wish
to allow other animals a place on this planet, this is one mistake that we don't need to make. I urge everyone to make FERC aware of these sightings and
the presence of this endangered and internationally protected species. The whales themselves seem to have decided it is time to settle the debate about
their Fundy range! Date: Thurs, Sep 28 2006 3:42 pm From: "Art" ---------Hansard Quote ------- Mr. Mike
Allen (Tobique-Mactaquac, CPC): Tues, Oct 3 2006 5:56 am From:
"Art" This is a very important statement by PM Harper.
Please let you friends Saint Croix Courier St. Stephen, NB 2006 August 25 Fog
We who oppose LNG in our Bay Sightings of Whale & Birds
by Brier Island Whale & Seabird Tours Hello Everyone: While out on a whale
survey today, we were pleased to sight a Blue whale. We spent some
time watching it and getting the required photographs for
photo-identification. This species can be individually identified
by the pattern on the back and also any scarring it may have.
Though not the first time blue whales have been sighted here, it still
was very exciting to see. Birds sighted were northern gannets, puffins,
2 red phalaropes (a male and a female, the female was in bright breeding
plumage) and Wilson's storm petrels. Response Mon, Jun 26 2006, from:
"Art" - Now we are talking rare!!! A Killer Whale
was reported at Grand Manan this past week and now a Blue whale at Brier
Island!! Fundy is a FERC Approves Three New LNG Terminals and Two Expansions — Quoddy Tides, Eastport, ME June 25, 2006
Calais' kiss of death Date: Wed, Apr 12 2006 4:31 pm From:
"Editor" MP vows to keep tankers out of Canadian waters.
Last updated Apr 12 2006 02:21 PM ADT. CBC News Date: Wed, Apr 12 2006 4:37 pm. Mr.
Joseph T. Kelliher, Chairman, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission |