|
TO:
FERC docket #PF06-13
RE: Topics of concern FERC pre-filing process from Richard E. Berry
April 15, 2006
1)
Geology
“Neotectonics
of Maine” Studies in
Seismicity, Crustal Warping, and Sea-Level Change, Edited by Walter A.
Anderson, State of Me. Geologist and Harold W. Burns, Jr. Quaternary
Geologist of the University of Maine.
In my conversations with Quaternary
Geologist Harold W. Borns, Jr. in November of 2005 he stated that:
a)
There is an earthquake fault down the axis of Passamaquoddy Bay
known as the Oak Bay Fault.
b) There are records of
many small and some large earthquakes in the Bay area.
c) The area is sinking at
the rate of 3 feet per century causing sea-level rise and erosion.
d) A study of the Bay was conducted for the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission in 1978 thru 1986. On pg.
4 of the book,” Neotectonics of Maine”is listed the names
and titles of the research team.
e) A naturalist by the name of Ganong stated in the year 1900 that one
third of St. Croix Island in Passamaquoddy Bay had already sunk.
The crustal warping study has shown that
neotectonic activity in Maine is defined by recurrent seismicity and
secular changes in relative sea level.
Earthquakes have been recorded historically in the state since
the 1700’s. They occur
most commonly in certain areas of Maine, such as the Passamaquoddy Bay
region on the Maine-New Brunswick border.
Several lines of evidence suggest that eastern Maine is
undergoing more rapid submergence than coastal localities to the
southwest , probably because of differential crustal subsidence in the
vicinity of Passamaquoddy Bay. The
collapse and migration of a crustal bulge which formed along the
margin of the Laurentide Ice Sheet may be contributing to the
downwarping and seismic activity.
However, this theory alone is not adequate to explain the
apparent localization of more rapid subsidence in eastern coastal
Maine, which is occurring at rates of up to at least 5 mm/yr.
The distinctive bedrock lithology, structure, and long-term
tectonic mobility of this area are believed to cause its present
instability.
2)
Air Quality
The DELNG developers stated they would use up to 1.5% of their natural
gas in the regasification process. Passamaquoddy Bay -
Mill Cove area experiences days and sometimes as much as a week
of very foggy (low ceilings) weather.
A FERC representative stated that under those conditions any
gases from the regasification process would be detrimental to ones
health.
3)
Noise Pollution
The DELNG developers have said there would be very little noise
connected to the LNG unloading and regasification.
They also said at least one tug would remain at the unloading
terminal. I question their
calming comments in relation to noise pollution.
4)
Fresh Water Usage
Ships need to take on ballast after unloading their cargo.
DELNG developers told me that they would use fresh water for
ballast. The question is
how much fresh water will be needed for this purpose.
The developer said they would drill at least two wells.
QUESTION? Will the
fresh water usage for the DELNG facility and ship ballast effect the
aquifer or aquifers that supply the Town of Robbinston.? Nearby Boyden
Lake supplies the City of Eastport with it's drinking water supply.
5)
Shoreland Zoning
The State of Maine has strict shoreland zoning
laws. Included in the State’s shoreland zoning are:
a) Protect coastal
wetlands which are swampy marshes, bog, flat or other land above extreme
low water, water which is subject to tidal action.
b) To prevent and
control water pollution
c) To conserve natural resources
d) To protect water quality, productive habitat, biotic systems,
and scenic and natural values
e) To protect archaeological and
historic resources
f) To conserve natural beauty and open space
g) To protect fish spawning grounds, aquatic life,
bird and other wildlife habitat
6)
Dredging
Would the US Army Corp of Engineers become involved if there is any
dredging? During low tide
Mill Cove empties completely exposing a shifting build-up of sand caused
by the tides. The pollution
which has settled on the floor of Passamaquoddy Bay would best be left
undisturbed.
In closing I would like to point
out that during the various LNG meetings held by the developers with
attendance of the US Coast Guard, members of FERC and various State
Department Representatives there was never any mention of
the fact that Passamaquoddy Bay is an earthquake prone area.
Submitted by:
Richard E. Berry
Robbinston, ME 04671 |